I wonder if he could be confusing the dot pattern of the 3000 for film grain? It looks just like it. Jerry In any case, If he's trying to print a grainy print on a 3000 printer, I would certainly expect his grain pattern and the printers dot pattern would cause an undesireable effect, sort of like a mo\ufffdre pattern. Todd Flashner wrote: > > >> After spending quite some time trying to print images with pronounced grain > >> characteristics, I have to agree with Nick that > >> the standard separation methods do not work well with them. > >> He could print step wedges 'til we have a democrat in the White House to > >> verify the workflow and still his prints would not > >> convey the right feel, and in fact, look posterized in some parts of the > >> scale > >> with every standard workflow I've tried. > > > > > > I'm no John Brownlow, but I'll take the challenge using Roark's method. > > > > Send me your address. > > Todd > > > > PS, I know you primarily use a 3000. Is it possible that is limiting what > you can do in this regard? Have you tried a printer that makes finer dots? > > Todd > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] More quadtone experiences -- Black ink
2001-08-25 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.