Digital BW, The Print

The D1's are cheap because they are obsolete.

The D1X is so much better. Besides resolution, the
D1's had, in my experience, a problem with rendering
Caucasian skin tones properly. The review may still be
posted at www.dpreview.com

Jim
--- Robert Morrison <rmorrison@...> wrote:
> On 5/27/02 9:48 AM, "jmoore50310"
> <jmoore274@...> wrote:
> 
> > Is the D1's 2.6mp resolution good enough to
> produce high quality A3
> > size prints?
> 
> No.  You need a minimum of 6megapixel.  I shot a D1
> for about a year and a
> half and got many lovely 5x7 and some 8x10 that I
> was happy with though.
> Don't expect to be able to crop...you need the full
> 2.7mp from the D1 for an
> 8x10.  Personally I wouldn't buy a used D1...the D1x
> was a quantum leap
> forward in so many ways...not just image quality. 
> You may want to take a
> look at the D100...that would almost certainly be a
> better option.
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com