Apologies in advance if I screw this post up. I get the digest, and have never tried to respond to a query on this list. on 5/28/02 8:54 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote: > I would just add one comment to Jeff's below about the Polaroid 120, which I > also have. It is not full frame along the sides of the medium format > carrier. At least not with my Pentax 67 negs. I am losing 1 to 2mm of image > on each side. Tim Spragens went with the Minolta and we exchanged some files > back and forth. The quality is the same but the Minolta has the glass > carrier available so that you do not have to sacrifice any film area. Other > than that the Polaroid has been a great unit. Nice 35mm scanner too. I lose a bit on the negative edges with the 120 as well. I just ordered a glass carrier for the 120 direct from Polaroid (new product, available only for the past week according to the person on the phone). Price was $129. If I remember rightly, the person on the phone claimed it had a 61mm wide opening, which would be about 5mm wider than my standard carrier. I should receive the carrier sometime next week, and will send anyone who wants it a quick negative coverage evaluation. I agree that the 120 is a great scanner. --clyde rogers
Message
Re: Polaroid SprintScan 120...?
2002-05-28 by xrogers
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.