> For the sake of simplicity, lets assume you've got an 8Mp 36x24mm digital > camera. This camera would have enough resolution to record the 50 lp/mm > images you can expect when hand-holding with consumer-grade lenses and > filters. However, putting that camera on a tripod and using professional > lenses won't get you any extra resolution. Nothing you do can increase the > amount of detail you can capture (those lucky film guys can always upgrade > to better film/lenses/tripods/filters/etc for more detail!). Darren, Aside from the difference for color, which, I agree, isn't that big a deal, there's a huge difference for B&W though...as these mentioned digicams only shoot in Bayer pattern RGB, you really don't get near the resolution and accurate tonality you get from B&W film with a digicam. Another issue is that film grains are random (in position and somewhat in size), digicams are not. Because of this, they really don't map 1:1 as far as resolution goes... For most color work not requiring much enlargement, most people will be quite happy with a 6M pixel Bayer pattern digicam of decent quality, and certainly 8 would be better ;-) Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Print Quality From A Nikon D1
2002-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.