This is very good advice. I have the Epson 2450 and a Nikon 8000. I got the Epson for scanning 4"x5" and larger but I have also tried it out on my 6x7cm negs and the results are quite good. The Nikon is definitely better but it is hard to say that it is $2500 better. I happy with the Nikon but only after I invested an extra 350.00 in a rotated glass carrier. For medium format the glass carrier is an absolute necessity. I wish I had know that before wasting time on scans with the non-glass carrier. Wendel On 5/31/02 5:44 PM, "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@...> wrote: > Don, > > The dedicated film medium format film scanners will give you some impressive > results. It really comes down to $$$ vs. quality as usual. > > If money is tight, people have been reporting very good things on this list > and elsewhere about the Epson 2450 which will scan negatives up to 4"x9". > This seems to be equaling or bettering flatbeds in the $1,000 to $1,500 > range. ------------snipped-------------
Message
Re: MF Scanners was Re: [Digital BW] Re: Medium Format--Rangefinders
2002-06-01 by Wendel White
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.