Digital BW, The Print

Hi Staedman

You go up to 16x20 on a 5000 with a D30 from memory don't you? Ever 
had to blow up to that size from half the negative.

The fact that you were producing prints that size from a D30 was a 
cause for some hope for me. "Skin that looked like velvet..." as I 
recall.

> Garry, 
> 
> I enjoyed reading your message below and taking the virtual visit 
to your dark room.  
> Enjoy those "memory strips" while you can.  Nothing wrong with 
that.  
> 
> But....I bet if you were to buy something like the Canon 
D60....and open your mind to a new experience/method...you would 
have fun too.  A different world of fun.  A different way of making 
those images you enjoy so much.   
> 
> As for the small viewfinder....well that is a difference..no 
doubt.  
> 
> As for the single hair going 20 inches....I suppose that is in the 
eye of the beholder.  
> 
> Despite what Austin may think (and I generally respect 
his 'pinions), you can still produce wonderful images with a D30 or 
D60 (for example).  
> 
> Oddly enough...my portrait clients aren't looking for a single 
hair.  They tend to enjoy the "big picture" so to speak...and the 
quality of the images is what makes them go "ooh" and sometimes even 
brings a tear to an eye (usually the mother looking at the 
daughter's portrait).  Digital or not...there is a lot more to a 
powerful image than pixels or "grain" and most clients (the buyers 
of the portraits in this case), don't care what technology you use 
to make the image...it is the image they want.  
> 
> Still....my opinion is that you could find the Digital Difference 
to be an enlightening and exciting difference.  
> 
> Respectfully, 
> Steadman
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: garrysarre 
>   To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y... 
>   Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:29 AM
>   Subject: [Digital BW] Get a Leaf Austin
> 
> 
>   Having finally ordered the 9600, I have been looking for nice 
things 
>   being said about 35mm digital hoping to skip the scanning era. 
Just 
>   when I think I am sold on a DCS 760 or maybe even a D60. Austin 
>   smashes my illusions to smithereens, not once but over and over 
>   again.
> 
>   I justify my thoughts in digi snapping:
> 
>   I only do portrait - soft is OK, gentle is nice too. Yes, with 
>   digital, my photographs can be more gentle. What's interpolation 
to 
>   skin? Hmm, but the hair will be jaggedy.
> 
>   If they can stretch a D30 to 12x16, surely a D60 will go to 
20x24, 
>   and you do step back further for bigger ones. Maybe I can give 
up 
>   cropping, compose perfectly whilst shooting and change all my 
print 
>   sizes to match the sensor proportion so I can use every last 
pixel.
> 
>   No more dividing the frame up into grids and de-spotting film 
scans. 
>   Backwards and forwards, space/mouse over and over.
> 
>   If I do this switch, I know I will I miss heading into the seedy 
>   area of town where my darkroom is, unlocking the ex maltings 
>   warehouse, and wondering down to the back, through the double 
dark 
>   curtains after checking evaporation of the dev' in the Hope 
>   overnight, pulling out the nights printing from my leather case 
that 
>   I got in San Francisco on a trip to Disneyland with my kids, 
laying 
>   out these marvelous antique memory strips of century old 
technology, 
>   the 120 film strip, slipping it in to the enlarger, focusing 
through 
>   the magnifier at full arm stretch whilst pondering how old 
fashioned 
>   this all will seem soon. I will miss my wierd shaped dodgers and 
the 
>   little inventions that I know I am the only one in the world to 
use. 
>   I test, test again, full size now, nearly there, one more time 
40 
>   minutes later, the most beautiful richly goldern sepia 20x30 
flops 
>   into the basket, I hold it up and see an exquisitely fine 
detailed 
>   optical/chemical photograph. I follow the intricate line of a 
single 
>   hair as it loops down the side of a face a full 20 inches, it's 
>   shiny on one side and thinner in one spot as it twists and curls 
>   across a full spectrum of goldern greys with narry a pixel, 
jaggy or 
>   microband to be seen.
> 
>   I can't do it, I can't even see through the piddly view finder 
of an 
>   SLR. Looking through my Hasselblad bright viewfinder is BEING 
THERE. 
>   Your mascara is clumped on your second from the left eyelash, 
look 
>   straight at the lens not my head. Why do I have to spent multi 
>   thousands to make worse photographs?
> 
>   I can't do this unless I have a full frame back for the Blad and 
>   that's it. In the meantime, I will have to put up with Bloody 
>   scanning.
> 
>   I need a 120 scanner. I only do B&W, 24 frames per subject. I 
will 
>   produce low definition scans for previews and then scan about a 
>   dozen for printing on the 9600 from 8x10 upwards.
> 
>   What is a Leaf and is it one frame scan at a time.  It would be 
good 
>   if I could automatically slide 3 frames or more through for 
previews 
>   at a time (like the Nikon 8000). Any suggestions or knowledge 
>   appreciated.
> 
>   Garry Sarre
>   www.sarre.com.au
> 
> 
>   Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page 
is at:
> 
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
>   Please follow these basic guidelines:
>   - Include your full name with your message.
>   - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
>   - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep them short.
>   - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the 
subject header.
>   - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
"flames."
>   - Complete your Yahoo profile.
>   - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service. 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]