Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] print quality: digital vs. wet darkroom

2002-06-05 by Jerry Olson

As a general rule, I think Digital inkjet prints are much better than
darkroom prints in shadow detail, highlight detail, sharpness and wide
tonal scale. They still don't "Look" like a darkroom print. No paper
available to inkjet papers looks exactly like a darkroom print. Can't
understand what the reason for this is. You'd think that by now paper
manufacturers could make such a paper. Once behind glass, you can't tell
them apart though.

Jerry

torreyvosk wrote:
> 
> i'm thinking about getting into digital  B&W printing, and i can't
> seem to find any serious comparisons of print quality between
> traditonal wet darkrooms and the digital alternative.  I'm aware of
> all the benefits that computer photo editing offers, but is the final
> print truly compareable in terms of contrast, sharpness, grain,
> shadow detait, etc.?  any thoughts anyone?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> torrey
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.