Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] print quality: digital vs. wet darkroom

2002-06-05 by daschkenas@aol.com

I recently scanned a 2,1/4 color neg, at 2400 dpi with an Epson 2450 scanner, I also had an 8x10 C print made from the same neg, which I flatbed scanned at 300 dpi.  The flatbed scanned print printed better on my 1280 than the scann from the negative.  I realize that it may indeed be a step backwords to scan prints rather than negs, but this project began with going thru old prints, it was so much easier to scan the existing print, which was a good fiber based toned print, rather than search for the negative and start from scratch. Also, a quality film scanner costs several thousand dollars, I picked up a used Umax Mirage II on ebay last year for 600.00 I can scan prints up to 12 x 17, and make a great print on my 1280.
Since I still have a darkroom in the house, I decided to take this route untill Nikon comes out with a full frame CCD digital 35mm camera.  Using mostly wide lenses, I couldn't get by with current 35 mm digital cameras.
In any event it works for me.
David Aschkenas

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.