--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > As I told the Bay Area group a while ago, I'm likely to make an alteration > in my VM-Sepia toner mix. I'm finding the darkest sepia that I can print > with the existing inkset to be a little too dark for my uses. Viewers > definitely like the curve I call the Light Sepia shade. > > So, I think I can improve image quality, including tone distribution, by > lowering the gamut of the toner slightly. > > By a pleasant coincidence, the almost-ready, non-warming sepia toner is > about ready for some final-mix fade testing. This new formula appears to > take care of the gamut-related issues. > > So, the scanned test strips show where I'm at now with the inkset, and a > non-warming, lower-gamut toner is where I'm likely to go. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com Hi Paul, I think I understand your desire to change the sepia mix. When you say lower-gamut, do you mean same basic density but less saturated color? Would you then just continue to use the same curves that you already use? It seems like that would work -- they would just be just closer in color. I'm mostly worried about the logistics of so many ink and curve combinations. I've been using an 1160 with the regular VM but I'm interested in getting another printer for VM sepia. I'd probably buy a 1280 but I could also convert a color 1270 that I already have. Besides the hardware differences, are the curves and future work better on either printer. BTW, I'm using a Mac and prefer OS X. I don't mean to pin you or MIS down but are these ink changes imminent or still in the "good idea" stage? As in: should I use carts for a while or load a CIS? Thanks, Roy
Message
Re: How´s the VM Sepia?
2002-06-07 by royvharrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.