Chris, I checked the site and I did not see the 2450 listed in the supported printers. Have you given it a try? In both 8 and 16-bit I recommend one of the edge sharpening procedures or a plugin such as Ultra-Sharpen. Martin Wesley http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "tzinzunzan2000" <ldmr@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 5:38 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: posterization > You might also want to try Vuescan -- http://www.hamrick.com/ > > Also, I agree -- from experience -- about remaining in 16-bit mode > for as long as possible. I've found that for most of the images I > print I can remain in 16-bit mode the whole way. With those that have > required 8-bit mode work, I try to keep it to a minimum. > > BTW, I've noticed that some of the sharpening actions that can only > be done in 8-bit mode have a tendency to leave artifacts on images > (seen in print comparisons). To remain in 16-bit mode I now forego > the sharpening actions and only apply a very mild USM pass, if I > sharpen at all. I find that this preserves the tonal integrity of the > image. > > Chris > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" > <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > I would recommend the full version of Silverfast for > > your scanner to get the 16-bit output option. You can download a > demo > > version to give it a try. > > > > Once you have a 16-bit file in PS do all of your large adjustments > before > > you drop to 8-bit. For some images you may have to stay in 16-bit > all the > > way through applying the RGB separation curves and printing. Some > people > > work this way on all their images. > > > > Martin Wesley > > http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "oncdoc301" <oncdoc@c...> > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...> > > Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 8:01 PM > > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: posterization > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "husseyhussey" <mh@t...> > > > wrote: > > > > > > mh: > > > > > > Thanks for your reply. I am scanning in 48>24 bit color mode then > > > converting to grayscale for editing. I have been using the > > > brightness/contrast sliders in a new adjustment layer to boost > those > > > areas which posterize ( I hope that is the correct term..it > appears > > > as merging of what as a photographer I would call zone III-IV > tones > > > into a single flat poorly detailed puddle. > > > > > (snip earlier) > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: posterization
2002-06-10 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.