Final dpi is crucial in GF IMO. A 4000dpi scan at neg size, without altering the print dpi for final sizing can take hours! Julian ----- Original Message ----- From: "SKID Photography" <skid@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:06 AM Subject: [Digital BW] Re:off topic Re: lossless archiving > > > > Last week I tried the trail version of Genuine fractals print pro to > > up size an 35mm neg to 10x8, it took an hour to process on a G4 Mac > > with 1 gb memory. The original scan was 20 mg and the final print > > over 100mg! So I have decided to go for the MrSid photoshop plugin. > > It is claimed that a 20 mg can be reduced to 1 mg , opened in > > Photoshop without detail loss, worked on and saved either in MrSid or > > TIFF. > > Did you try the 'compressed' option in Genuine Fractals? It would make sense that bumping a small image up to > 8x10 would increase the files size. You don't mention what dpi you saved the 8x10 to. > > Also, you could have saved that 100 MG image as a '12' (top) quality jpg, or as a LZW compressed tiff, to > knock down the size. > > We too, have found that when you bump an image way up in genuine fractals, it take a lot of computing power. > We assumed that was due to the complex algorithms used to effectively 'fill in the dots' between the original > pixels. > > Harvey Ferdschneider > partner, SKID Photography, NYC > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re:off topic Re: lossless archiving
2001-08-27 by Julian Thomas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.