The last time Yahoo got to be such a pain, there was some talk of alternatives. And I think it was concluded then that there was no better "free" - except for the pain - alternative to Yahoo. I can't remember whether there was no better pay-for-it alternative or whether a pay-for-it list was thought not feasible. But I think I'd rather pay to subscribe than put up with Yahoo. Sam McCandless samcc@... >In view of these new Yahoo problems, I thought I should mention a situation >with cookies. > >I used to set my cookie prefs to "ask for each site". This way I could easily >decline marketing cookies and accept needed ones (subscriptions, accounts >etc). > >A few months ago, Yahoo changed its behaviour and locked me out of its >groups unless I set my prefs to "accept all cookies". This was clearly a new >move on their part as it didn't affect getting to my account >settings or yahoo >email. Just the groups. IOW, with cookies set to "ask", neither my group >membership was recognized nor my moderator or owner status. > >The moral of the story - besides how aggressive Yahoo has become with its >marketing practices - is to check your cookie prefs in relation to any changes >of status to your Yahoo groups. > >It's getting weirder.... > > >Antonis > ><and good luck contacting Yahoo about any of this>
Message
Is Yahoo's not-free lunch worth the pain? (was [Digital BW] Re: Yahoo List Problems - cookies)
2002-07-01 by Sam A. McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.