It might not be a bad idea for digital printers to supply a digital image of his work, if is lucky enough to sell to a museum, so they can reprint it after his death. If the photographer is that important, then of course it would be nice to have his work be just as nice in a couple hundred years as it is now. But the technology in maybe 20 years will be such that it will be difficult to find a reader for today's images. Hope none of you died with your works backed up to an 8 " floppy! I'm of the mind, that after I'm gone, I really don't care how long my works last. Of course I'm no Ansel or Brett, either. Jer Tim Atherton wrote: > > > Not sure I understand why it would be so important for any image to last > > 100 years or more. Most color images sure don't. > > Unless they are 500 year rated carbon pigment prints! > > >(Unless you're on of > > the top few dozen photographers in the world, then it may be of more > > concern). > > > > Actually, it's not the artistic value that might be of concern, but rather > their historical value as an archive. As a day to day record of our world > today. Working in a photographic archive of 250,000 images, we have some > going back to the 1890's. Many of them are seemingly mundane. A good few are > very good photographs. A lot are interesting or intriguing. But, we still > get hundreds of reference request for images from this collection. From > researchers, writers, magazine, people hunting down family or tribal > history, school kids doing projects - the whole gamut. > > The images come from every source you can imagine - families, > anthropologists, archaeologists, bush pilots, exploration geologists, > missionaries, civil servants, miners, photographers, wives of Mounties (some > of our best images - Geraldine Moodie's portraits from across the Arctic as > she accompanied her RCMP Inspector husband in 1906-08) and many more.. > > If many of these images were inkjet prints, they would be around, even with > 80 years of life. So yes, it is important (unless, o course you can give us > the digital file! But bear in mind, many items in archives are not > negatives - those are long gone, but rather prints). > > tim a > > Wearing his hat as > > Senior Digital Imaging Technician, > NWT Archives > > (as opposed to editorial, Architectural, stock and several other kinds of > photographer :-) ) > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Print Life was Epson 2200,1280 and quad tone options
2002-07-04 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.