>[snip] Thanks for your responses, Sam and Martin. My next question >is why I read so >much about piezo inks and rarely hear mention of the Lyson quad black inks. >I ended up trying them because they are much less expensive and don't >require software - so it was just easy! And as I said I think the prints are >beautiful. So, is there something I should know about these inks that would >sway me towards the piezotones? Thanks. > >Lynne Siler >http://www.lynnesiler.com Jerry's and Bruce's comments give me pause. But I haven't recently heard anything else about Lysonic-E quad tones that might push you away from them and toward PiezoTones. I used to hear it said that Lysonic inks clogged a lot. But I now think that those "clogs" were air bubbles caused by people trying, unsuccessfully, to re-fill cartridges so they could buy Lysonic-E in bulk and therefore less expensively. That's not to say that you can't learn to re-fill successfully; some subscribers to this list do it so they can test a variety of ink sets. Photoshop wasn't among the software you were trying to avoid was it? Nearly all quad tone options involve Photoshop "plugin" software. But not necessarily printer "driver" software other than the drivers Epson provides. The Piezo driver, incidentally, was just unbundled, so it's now less expensive to use it. You gave your URL this time. I looked at the images on your web page, concentrating on the ones not in color. And I was struck by the variety in tone among the other images. I don't think you could print them all with any one quad tone inkset other than either Lyson's Small Gamut (SG) or one of InkSupply.com's "Variable Mix" (VM) inksets, probably Sepia-Neutral. But I do think you might be able to print them all with Epson's new 2200 printer. I hear it's neither easy nor inexpensive to change from or to a Lysonic-E inkset. That seems like an argument for sitting tight with the Lysonic-E you like until you can get a good feel for the 2200. I'd look at hard since you're interested both in color and in B&W in a variety of tones. Conceivably, the 2200 might do it all well. I have the impression that a lot of us are wondering whether to have two 1270s/1280s/1290s or hope instead to be able to use just one 2200. It seems to me an unusually complicated question. But if I had a good thing going with B&W on a 1270 I thought would last a while, I'd be tempted to get another, or a 1280, to use for color until the 2200's successor comes along in a year or two. It's maybe a little off topic, but I wish someone had elaborated a few such models for the list to mull over. Sam McCandless samcc@...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 801
2002-07-05 by Sam A. McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.