Digital BW, The Print

I don´t find the link anymore, but I have seen that comparision once. The Epson (that I have as well) is better, its not a huge difference, but visible. The Epson is in fact  exceptional value for the money. 

I was about to get the new Minolta MF or the Polaroid 120 when a professional photographer I know recommended me to save the money for a nice trip and get the Epson 2450 instead. He has the Polaroid 120 but said he partly uses the 2450 now instead because the images look somehow more natural. 

Specially for those who print up to A3+ the Epson is godsent for MF work.

Greetings Bernhard

----- Original Message ----- 

  Jerry,
  have you actually compared (or seen any comparison of) scans from the
  epson2450 vs. canon2400?


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]