Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanners with film adaptors - good, bad, or ugly?

2002-07-09 by Tim Atherton

We just got an Epson 1680 at work which I'm going to try with 8x10 and 4x5
see how it works. I'll be interested to see how a pro epson scanner compares
to the consumer ones.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moreno Polloni [mailto:mp@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:12 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Flatbed scanners with film adaptors - good,
> bad, or ugly?
>
>
> > I strongly recommend you actually scan a typical slide/negative with the
> > brand of scanner you are going to buy before you buy it. I personally
> > have never seen a really crisp, sharp scan from any epson scanner,
> > especially with smaller negatives. But they do fine with the larger
> > negs, especially the 4x5. I don't think epson optics are in the same
> > league as canons.
>
> I'd suggest the Epson scans are much like your beloved D30. Very
> smooth, but
> not incredibly sharp. However, they can take a fair bit of sharpening.
>
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks,
> Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier
> messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.