Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

[Digital BW] Re: Flatbed scanners with film adaptors - good, bad, or ugly?

2002-07-09 by heliar333

Godfrey - 

> I think you will see that the 2450 returns at least close to its 
rated
> 2400 ppi in comparison with the Minolta's rated 2820ppi. I have not 
done
> tests of a calibration negative (have to obtain one, haven't had the
> time) but my eyeball estimation is that it's delivering on its
> specification properly. 

You may be right. Perhaps you could make a scan with the Minolta that 
closely matches the Epson's 2400 dpi. That's what I did: I just kept 
lowering the number until I got the closest match. 

This won't tell us the actual resolution, but it might give us a 
clue. I see the difference in your scans, particularly in your #2 
scans, which show the text on the bottles. In the Epson scan, they 
are almost illegible. I would politely ask, how low do you have to 
set the Minolta to match the Epson ?

Best wishes,

Ken Lee

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.