Godfrey - > I think you will see that the 2450 returns at least close to its rated > 2400 ppi in comparison with the Minolta's rated 2820ppi. I have not done > tests of a calibration negative (have to obtain one, haven't had the > time) but my eyeball estimation is that it's delivering on its > specification properly. You may be right. Perhaps you could make a scan with the Minolta that closely matches the Epson's 2400 dpi. That's what I did: I just kept lowering the number until I got the closest match. This won't tell us the actual resolution, but it might give us a clue. I see the difference in your scans, particularly in your #2 scans, which show the text on the bottles. In the Epson scan, they are almost illegible. I would politely ask, how low do you have to set the Minolta to match the Epson ? Best wishes, Ken Lee
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Flatbed scanners with film adaptors - good, bad, or ugly?
2002-07-09 by heliar333