In a message dated 07/09/2002 10:01:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time, heliar@... writes: > In the meanwhile, I have my sights on the Microtek Artix 2500. Others > have attested that it delivers a genuine 2500 dpi. At $3500, it ought > to. I have seen some gorgeous quadtone prints by Richard Wolfson, who > uses an Agfa 2500 (made by Microtek) for his 4x5 negatives - and they > are stunning and sharp at 20x24 inches and beyond. > > There have been several New Microtec Artixscan 2500's on e-bay from the > same seller over the past few months. I got one for 1400.00. I don't no if > he has any more but I watched him sell about 5 of them! All around > 12-1400.00 I also have the Agfa 2500 on its last legs , and yes it the same > scanner as the Microtek just different software. New Microteks can be had > under 2,000 in any case as a few delears have 1/2 off sales. Can easily get > 24x30's from either of these scanners from 4x5 and very nice 16x20's from > 6x7 negs. > Steve Meyers [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Flatbed scanners with film adaptors - good, bad, or ugly?
2002-07-09 by sdmey4@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.