Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Flatbed scanners with film adaptors - good, bad, or ugly?

2002-07-09 by sdmey4@aol.com

In a message dated 07/09/2002 10:01:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
heliar@... writes:


> In the meanwhile, I have my sights on the Microtek Artix 2500. Others 
> have attested that it delivers a genuine 2500 dpi. At $3500, it ought 
> to. I have seen some gorgeous quadtone prints by Richard Wolfson, who 
> uses an Agfa 2500 (made by Microtek) for his 4x5 negatives - and they 
> are stunning and sharp at 20x24 inches and beyond.
> 
> There have been several New Microtec Artixscan 2500's on e-bay from the 
> same seller over the past few months. I got one for 1400.00. I don't no if 
> he has any more but I watched him sell about 5 of them! All around 
> 12-1400.00 I also have the Agfa 2500 on its last legs , and yes it the same 
> scanner as the Microtek just different software. New Microteks can be had 
> under 2,000 in any case as a few delears have 1/2 off sales. Can easily get 
> 24x30's from either of these scanners from 4x5 and very nice 16x20's from 
> 6x7 negs.
> Steve Meyers




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.