Because of my poor communication skills, I've given you precisely the opposite impression I intended. I'm really sorry, and I certainly hope no one stops asking questions. I certainly do see a difference in prints, but it seems image dependent, and occasional, and subtle. I don't recall seeing a difference on the monitor. Sorry Todd, and sorry list for my participation in this kind of exchange. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Todd Flashner <tflash@e...> wrote: > Well, you've certainly done a nice job of plucking all the negative words > out of what I said to make it look like I'm up to no good. All I was asking > was if you saw a difference in print, then explained why I was asking. No > problem, I'll stop asking. > > Todd > > > I'm sorry, I didn't realize I was in a debate, on a side, had a case to prove, > > or was bantering. It's simply an idea that may or > > may not be useful, and if anyone is trying it perhaps their results will tell > > us something. Since I knew you had been trying it > > with a workflow different than mine, and certainly more commonly used here > > than mine, your observations would be > > helpful, and they are. > > Thanks, > > Tyler
Message
[Digital BW] Re: CMYK workflow
2001-08-28 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.