Hi list, I have been away from the list for awhile and just signed back on. What is the alignment box about? I have never seen this? Are these boxes supposed to be on an 1160? I have been having microbanding problems with my 1160 quad mis varitone/archival matte. Nozzle checks are perfect, high speed is off, What else can I try? Do 1160 users just have to live with micro banding? BTW the prints are beautiful otherwise. Thanks Randy Laskody Jerry Olson wrote: > > Tom, I'm aligning the heads with the MIS hextone inks. The #9 patch is the least grainy. I don't understand how that aligns the heads! I now > have flawless prints with the creamiest smoothest tones possible, but the prints I had been making aren't much different if at all. This > would be the first time in 2 full sets of ink bottles that the printer has been aligned properly, it never was aligned before, as I just > kept clicking the realignment button, I always wondered why it took so many times to realign the heads. After about 8 tries, they were > aligned, but were they really? I got the 8's to align correctly , but never printed the boxes to choose the least grainy box. > > Maybe they were aligned, maybe not. > > Jerry > > Tom Keesling wrote: > > > That's interesting...and good to hear! If you have that much > > latitude, I wonder why, given your experience with the 1280, I and so > > many others have had such problems with the Piezo Color inks in the > > 1280? I could never get a clear indication of which color patches to > > select when I ran the printhead alignment as long as the Piezo Color > > inks were being used. > > > > I wonder if our two printers happen to be from opposite ends of the > > quality control spectrum, or if something else in its design explains > > this seeming paradox. Or is it possibly just a difference in the > > characteristics of the two inksets? > > > > Not a technician by any means... > > > > Tom > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Jerry Olson > > <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > > > Tom, > > > > > > Well actually, that is interesting. The prints I have been printing > > aren't that much different from the ones I am now getting with the > > heads > > > properly aligned. Even though the heads weren't aligned correctly, > > there must be a lot of wiggle room. I have never seen banding on the > > > 1280. It sure does take a long time to align the heads on the > > 1280. Nearly an hour. > > > > > > Jerry > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
what is this alignment box stuff? and 1160 microbanding
2001-08-29 by Randy L
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.