Thanks Ernst, Well that would explain it. I've always wondered why my bigger prints are better than the 8x10's! Jerry > > Bob, I know this is very weird, but if I have a 40 or so MG file, my > > larger prints are always sharper than my small ones. A 13 or 15 inch > > print is always sharper and more detailed than an 8x10. This assumes a > > 300 or 360 DPI file resolution at the output size. > > > > In fact, a 4x5 print is nowhere near as detailed and sharp as a 12 inch > > print. Is this normal? > > If your printer has to print a smaller image the chance that the ink bleeds > increases compared to the maximum size that the printer can print. This can > be a very small difference in ink bleed but a huge difference in sharpness. > For a similar reason I print my targets for profiling at the left side of > the 9000, the target is much smaller than the usual print size done on the > printer and by printing at the left side the head has to travel over a > longer distance per stroke so more drying time in between. That resembles > the normal drying time better. > > In Photoshop you place a smaller copy of the image on the normal size and > print that total to the largest size possible on the printer. Check the > differences in sharpness with a loupe. Detail is another matter, a larger > print will always show more detail if the file is too big for both printed > sizes. Foggy scenes not counting. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Canon D60 Question
2002-07-25 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.