Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Luminous Landscape 2200 Review

2002-07-30 by Jeff Magidson

Mitch Alland wrote:
> 
> After reading Reichmann's conclusion that B&W on the 2200 was so good right out of the box that he was retiring his Piezography system, I had a nagging memory that he had said something similar about the 1280. Actually, it was the 1270. Here's what he wrote in the 1270 review:
> 
> >I've found that the 1270 printer produces monochrome prints with
> >essentially no colour cast. On Heavyweight Matt Paper, through
> >a 4X loupe, they are virtually indistinguishable from a
> >traditional silver print on matt paper. To the naked eye,
> >completely so.
> 
> Clearly, his demands for B&W do not seem to be what many of the people on this list require. Therefore, we need some other judgments on this matter.
> 
> --Mitch/Bangkok


Good going Mitch ! 
I had remembered that same quote and I was also going to hunt it down
and post it on here. I had read that at the beginning of my Inkjet quest
almost 2 years ago and it gave me false hope....


-Jeff

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.