Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Luminous Landscape 2200 Review

2002-07-30 by Martin Wesley

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Magidson" <jeffm@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Luminous Landscape 2200 Review


>
>
> Mitch Alland wrote:
> >
> > After reading Reichmann's conclusion that B&W on the 2200 was so good
right out of the box that he was retiring his Piezography system, I had a
nagging memory that he had said something similar about the 1280. Actually,
it was the 1270. Here's what he wrote in the 1270 review:
> >
> > >I've found that the 1270 printer produces monochrome prints with
> > >essentially no colour cast. On Heavyweight Matt Paper, through
> > >a 4X loupe, they are virtually indistinguishable from a
> > >traditional silver print on matt paper. To the naked eye,
> > >completely so.
> >
> > Clearly, his demands for B&W do not seem to be what many of the people
on this list require. Therefore, we need some other judgments on this
matter.
> >
> > --Mitch/Bangkok
>
>
> Good going Mitch !
> I had remembered that same quote and I was also going to hunt it down
> and post it on here. I had read that at the beginning of my Inkjet quest
> almost 2 years ago and it gave me false hope....
>
>
Jeff,

Same here! I spent many frustrating hours working with my 1270 trying to
make B&W prints that pleased me. It was enough though to convince me that
digital printing had the potential and lead me on to Piezo and a 1200 which
is another story.

And my thanks also to Mitch for unearthing that old review to giving us some
perspective.

Martin Wesley

http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.