To: "Editor P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@...> >Mary Ellen Marks and Annie Leibovitz for example have no frigging clue >about actually printing... Doesn't make them unsuccessful.. Go see a >shoot be either one, they don't even look through the camera until the >last moment.. EVERYTHING except pressing the shutter is done by >assistants, etc.. After years of think about this, I have decided that >neither one is a real photog in my book (nor in many other photog's >"books") anymore.. Great editors, yes, as that is essentially what they >do, pick a great print from contacts and proofs.. Great marketers? >yes.. Great photogs.. No.. Even good printers? HAHAHAHAHA >Not! Now, I don't think much of Leibovitz as a photographer and Mary Ellen Marks is not a favorite of mine; but to state that they are not real photographers strikes me as nonsensical. By this measure Henri Cartier-Bresson is not a real phorographer either, as he did not make his own prints. --Mitch/Bangkok
Message
Re:Luminous Landscape 2200 Review
2002-07-31 by Mitch Alland
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.