> > There is a HUGE processing saving (and that means in time as well) > > because no interpolation is necessary.. > > It isn't that big a deal...in fact, it is easily done in hardware, and the > cost is very minimal. I've developed some hardware interpolation > filters... > > Austin > > Please forgive my ignorance, but I was under the impression that > if the chip were able to capture all three elements (RGB etc), > without interpolation and guestimating the correct color > information, it would save a tremendous amount of time. what do > you mean by it isn't that big a deal? I wait 40 seconds for a > tiff file to be created Hi George, I highly doubt that is due to interpolation. > ( although i will soon be trying raw), > and emptying out a buffer during a portrait session can seem like eons. > I thought that the Foveon would eliminate all the algorithyms > etc. that take so long to create and write a file. You can certainly test this by simply creating a raw image file... I can see if you are doing compression, that might slow things up...but interpolation should be being done in hardware, and therefore take up literally no additional time. But again, I don't know what different manufacturers do, so I really can't say. Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW]Foveon and saving time, was... Storage of digital images
2002-08-01 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.