Hi Bob, I dunno. I certainly didn't mean to imply I thought Jeff's way was better - they both offer a lot of control. The one thing I do like about Jeff's way is that it's easy for me to toggle the layers on and off to remind myself what each channel looks like. With Russell's I feel a little like I'm swinging those sliders almost arbitrarily. OTOH, if I want to do something tricky to a non primary color (i.e. cyan) I'd rather do it with Russell's approach. I'm sure whichever method one has the most familiarity with will serve them best. Todd Flashner > Todd, > > Isn't Russell Brown's method better still? > > Bob Frost. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Todd Flashner" <tflash@...> >> >> You might want to try taking your action one step further. I got this from >> Jeff Schewe... >> >> Make each channel a layer, this allows you to adjust the opacity of each >> channel/layer, plus apply layer blend modes too. For instance, and this is >> arbitrary, you could put the red channel above the green, set it's blend >> mode to multiply, and it's opacity to 60%, the green channel could be set > to >> screen at 30%, etc...) >> >> He finds it more intuitive, and powerful, than channel mixer.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Converting to B&W Workflow question
2002-08-02 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.