Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Converting to B&W Workflow question

2002-08-02 by Todd Flashner

Hi Bob,

I dunno. I certainly didn't mean to imply I thought Jeff's way was better -
they both offer a lot of control. The one thing I do like about Jeff's way
is that it's easy for me to toggle the layers on and off to remind myself
what each channel looks like. With Russell's I feel a little like I'm
swinging those sliders almost arbitrarily. OTOH, if I want to do something
tricky to a non primary color (i.e. cyan) I'd rather do it with Russell's
approach. I'm sure whichever method one has the most familiarity with will
serve them best.

Todd Flashner

> Todd,
> 
> Isn't Russell Brown's method better still?
> 
> Bob Frost.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Todd Flashner" <tflash@...>
>> 
>> You might want to try taking your action one step further. I got this from
>> Jeff Schewe...
>> 
>> Make each channel a layer, this allows you to adjust the opacity of each
>> channel/layer, plus apply layer blend modes too. For instance, and this is
>> arbitrary, you could put the red channel above the green, set it's blend
>> mode to multiply, and it's opacity to 60%, the green channel could be set
> to
>> screen at 30%, etc...)
>> 
>> He finds it more intuitive, and powerful, than channel mixer.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.