----- Original Message ----- From: "hsitz" <hsitz@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:48 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Do inkjets dither or not? > I realize that inkjet spots may now be so small that their prints > appear to be continous tone, but they still seem to fit the > definition of "half-tone" printers that compose specific single-color > pixels out of differently colored dots. And, at least by the meaning > of the terms as I learned them (from Blatner and Fraser), the classes > of half-tone printers and continuous-tone printers are mutually > exclusive. They are not. In litho printing there was a range offset>screenless offset>collotypie that represents that gradual change to continuous tone printing quite good. Conventional rotogravure comes very near to continuous tone printing, modern versions of it that rely on electronically engraved cilinders adapted halftone screening partly in the process but never totally. So these aren't exclusive systems. The same is possible in inkjet printing. Ink bleeding isn't always a negative issue in printing processes, conventional rotogravure partly depended on that effect to get a continuous tone result. No dot size differences in that proces but more or less ink per spot. Transparent ink of course. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Do inkjets dither or not?
2002-08-02 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.