Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images

2002-08-03 by Martin Wesley

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Atkielski" <atkielski@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Storage of digital images


> Martin writes:
>
> > If you have that much resolution in your file,
> > it would seem to me that you are better off
> > using it then not.
>
> There's no harm in using whatever resolution you have.  But if my file
> doesn't have enough pixels to print at 360 ppi at the size I want, there's
> no harm in printing at 300 ppi or even 240 ppi.  The implication is that
360
> ppi is _necessary_ for a decent print, but I do not find that to be true.
>
Anthony,

I will go along with you there but the earlier 160 ppi and 106 ppi figures
you used seem much too low to me. I think that in the 240 to 720 ppi range
it comes down to a matter of personal taste or artistic intent in the work.

Martin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.