> I rented (from a local photo equip rental co) a Polaroid Sprintscan > 120 with SilverFast 5.2 > I'm scanning the B&W negs (35 & 21/4) as 16 bit HDR Grayscale @ > 4000dpi (scanners optical res max). > My experience has been two-fold. I think that 4000dpi for 120 film is too high because the silver grains form clumps larger than 1/4000 of an inch. This means the scanner is scanning the grains. I would try using 2000dpi and compare prints. However, you are correct that the film/developer plays a surprising roll in all this. I've been shooting a bit of Tri-X 4x5, developing it in Pyro w/Ammidol added to preserve shadow detail, hence film speed. Actually, Color Services in Needham, MA does this for me. Pyro has a couple of interesting properties. The first is by staining the highlights yellow, it acts to lower contrast so you don't have to worry about n- development as much to preserve highlights. Secondly, by staining the highlight areas, there is much less film grain for a more velvety look. One more thing about films & developers. Some films like Tri-X have more contrast in them. Other films like HP5+ have less contrast. So in N+ development, films like HP5+ build density more than increasing contrast. Dave G.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Tri-x/HC110 user needs a change
2002-08-05 by dgabbe2001
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.