Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

[Digital BW] Re: Tri-x/HC110 user needs a change

2002-08-05 by dgabbe2001

> I rented (from a local photo equip rental co) a Polaroid 
Sprintscan 
> 120 with SilverFast 5.2
> I'm scanning the B&W negs (35 & 21/4) as 16 bit HDR 
Grayscale @ 
> 4000dpi (scanners optical res max).
> 

My experience has been two-fold.  I think that 4000dpi for 120 
film is too high because the silver grains form clumps larger 
than 1/4000 of an inch.  This means the scanner is scanning the 
grains.  I would try using 2000dpi and compare prints.

However, you are correct that the film/developer plays a 
surprising roll in all this.  I've been shooting a bit of Tri-X 4x5, 
developing it in Pyro w/Ammidol added to preserve shadow 
detail, hence film speed.  Actually, Color Services in Needham, 
MA does this for me. Pyro has a couple of interesting properties.  
The first is by staining the highlights yellow, it acts to lower 
contrast so you don't have to worry about n- development as 
much to preserve highlights.  Secondly, by staining the highlight 
areas, there is much less film grain for a more velvety look.

One more thing about films & developers.  Some films like Tri-X 
have more contrast in them.  Other films like HP5+ have less 
contrast.  So in N+ development, films like HP5+ build density 
more than increasing contrast.

Dave G.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.