Well, Austin, all I can say is "Huh?". All the answers seems to have missed the issue. Roy ----------- --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@i...> wrote: > Hi Roy, > > > The main point was that the 256 levels i.e. 8-bit > > files are only loosely connected with how many tones you can measure. > > Measuring them or not isn't the point. The point is, how are they derived, > if they are even derived at all. > > > In the original Piezo quote there's no mention of > > input or output resolution, > > I believe that on the Piezo email list, 100 tones was what the discussion > was. > > > I've got a "good" densitometer not the best. So I took one of > > the original > > step wedges from using Piezo, put the top gradient under the densitometer. > > Paper white is set at 0, the darkest was at 147. Sliding the > > paper gradually > > thru the meter, the densities just count up, 0,1,2,... easily hitting each > > integer value. So not surprisingly it looks like I have 148 gray tones. > > But did the printer intentionally print 148? I don't believe so. That's > inconsistency in the systems ability to represent a tone...and is an > important part of my point. > > > > > The tradeoff of gray levels versus resolution is really the entire > > > > basis of what's going on in printing. Previously in this discussion > > > > there was distinction of pixels versus dots, but I think this is > > > > an unnecessary and misleading distinction. Everything we have as > > > > far as Epson printers these days are pixels. The very smallest point > > > > on a print can contain any of 4 or 6 different gray/black inks drops, > > > > plus with variable droplet size and overprint of multiple drops, > > > > there are many possible gray values. So I would call this a > > > > pixel not a dot. > > > > > > Yeah, but it simply isn't a pixel, unless your "image" contains > > exactly the > > > values that are possible with the inks and droplet size (which > > is misleading > > > > What difference does it make what values they have? > > Everything. A pixel has a range of values. A dot does not. A dot is > simply a dot...and it can only contain one of the colors of available ink. > > > The point is > > that there are multiple gray values. > > Not for one single dot. > > > The distinction > > between pixels > > > and dots is VERY important, or we would not be dithering, and > > the printer > > > driver does dither. > > > > What's the distinction? You can and do dither either one. > > You can not dither a dot. > > Austin
Message
[Digital BW] Number of tones was Re: Do inkjets dither or not?
2002-08-05 by royvharrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.