At 07:31 PM 8/5/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi Frank,
>
>as to developers, try a roll or two in Rodinal, it will be anything
>but mushy unless your scanner doesn't focus well... and if that's the
>case the high accutance of this developer will help. It's available
>here in 125ml bottles (I don't know about stateside), and is
>inexpensive, so you won't be out much.
>
>I'm afraid that I forgot the format you're working, Julian's comments
>about AN glass could work two ways, if you're using a flatbed, put
>the film emulsion side down and cover with a piece of AN glass, if
>you're working with 35mm in a dedicated film scanner, mount the
>frames in AN glass slide mounts.
>
>> I don't mind grain per se and I've used this film/dev for a long
>> while with good result- now I guess I'm wanting it to serve me in the
>> digital as well as silver worlds :-)
>>
>> But it seems the grain is mushy not sharp/crisp. So maybe a silver
>> solvent dev likeD76 is the wrong way to go ?
>
>
>--
>Tim Spragens
>
>http://www.borderless-photos.de
>http://www.borderless-photos.com
>
Frank,
Grain is too fine for the scanner to reproduce as "natural" grain so
whatever developer you use may not make a diference. The scanner software
creates a grain-like texture that can range from soft to coarse. That is not
to say that you will not see a difference among developers. I would
experiment with the scanner settings and PS before switching to a new
developer. You want to get good at scanning your existing HC110 negs no?
AZ
Maker of Lookaround panoramic camera.
http://www.panoramacamera.us
or
keyword.com lookaroundMessage
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Tri-x/HC110 user needs a change
2002-08-06 by Alan Zinn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.