Antonis, thanks so much for all this info, this is great. I could have made a surer decision had I known all this. I'm just going to add a few things, and to Scott Hendershot's last post. I'm not trying to sell Spectrocams, just fill in some blanks. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Antonis Ricos" < antonisphoto@y...> wrote: snip... > What it doesn't do compared to the Spectrolino is that you cannot program > several reads of the same patch, something that makes readings of noisy > processes a bit more accurate (needed for art papers). The Spectrocam does do this. > - The Digital Swatchbook... ...transfering data to the host computer, saving it and > being able to export it. Spectrocam also. > > - Regarding profiling software, I guess since you are using this for mono / > quad you only have one choice. I wish we knew that for sure, but it's a small group of users, little chance of there being a variety of profiling software among us. Frustratating to only have Colorvision as an option, and I'm not sure it's the case. "Scott Hendershot" <scott@p...> wrote: > Martin, snip... > The Spectrocam software for the PC does not include monitor calibration like > your monitor spyder does. I think the software is lacking in this regard. Scott, it's a joke so don't lament. It throws up maybe 10 colors and generates a profile. No oportunity to adjust guns, nada. Probably about as useful as Adobe Gamma. You pay extra for it too. The Pro version of the software includes this "feature", as well as custom dot gain measurements, meaning non CMYK. Not that useful either, you can use the standard CMYK dot gain measurement ability for anything you need. Don't bother with the Pro upgrade. I found a beta of an excellent monitor calibration app that supports the cam, and Profile City has an excellent app that does as well. Both "exellent" apps create calibration from my highly acurate device for my highly acurate monitor that look... completely different! so... pretty happy that's squared away... Being on my fourth one is a problem, I wasn't happy about it. Some more mud for you. Tyler
Message
Re:Spectrophotometers
2001-08-31 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.