> >> > With the 3000 go piezo. Otherwise you'll have a large dot pattern in > >> > your photos. > >> > >> I have prints from Paul Roark and Tyler Boley that tell me > otherwise. The > >> 3000 prints I've seen printed through a good partitioned workflow look > >> great! > >> > >> Todd > > AF> Hi Todd, > > AF> Now, here's the question to follow up the "more than 1000 > tones" issue... > AF> How do the Rourke curve prints compare to the Piezo prints? > Is the tonality > AF> better? In the transitions? I believe you see where I'm > going with this... > > AF> Regards, > > AF> Austin > > > If you guys are going to keep "hijacking" posts Richard, > please change your > subject line. Certainly, a simple request, but did not warrant your accusation. I want to point out that YOU didn't change the subject line of this post either...shame on you! > While I do appreciate your discussions, when you take > things off into another tangent but leave the same subject it gets > confusing---let alone what it does to the archives for people in the > future. Just a friendly suggestion..... I certainly do understand, but please, "friendly suggestions" don't start out with an accusation of "hijacking". As I said, I understand, as well as agree, and am sorry for not thinking to change it. Simply a mere oversight, as I'm sure your not changing it either was, and that doesn't warrant being accused of "hijacking". Austin
Message
Changing subject line, hijacking and glass houses ;-) - was - RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Best printer for B&W Printing???
2002-08-09 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.