Yep, I wouldn't put a lot of money on my results. I've never gotten good (well, I've never gotten great) color results with my Profiler RGB and Astra 1200s combo either, but something may have been wrong in my workflow. What I found was that if I used Dan's RGB soft proof method I could quickly script a ball park curve from scratch (which shocked and scared me) by previewing the curve, as I wrote it, through the profile. Unfortunately, the profile did not preview Paul Roark's curves accurately, so I decided to just let it go, and stay with what I know, for the moment. Perhaps I'll give it a shot again (I mean an attempt, but as this is Dan's approach, I suppose any shot should be of Absolute <g>) in the not too distant future. It's definitely worth pursuing for anybody who plans to be writing their own RGB separation curves, but I'm woefully too lazy for that at this moment. Todd > >> Someone (Todd?) posted who had Profiler RGB that they couldn't make it work, >> I'm not sure why. Indications were it could, >> and scanner gamut problems aren't an issue here. Anyone with WiziWIG or >> EZcolor should give it a try too, may choke >> though. >> Tyler > > Might have been the processing time that fooled him. For some reason it is > a much more difficult set of calculations and the profile can take a half > hour or more for the computer to process (depending on the speed of the > computer). First couple of times I gave up because I thought the computer > had hung up. Then I let it process while I ran out to the store. When I > came back I had a profile - viola'. Now I just start it processing and > watch TV for a while. > > Dan
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Culbertson's RGB method A-OK
2001-09-02 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.