Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] What's your favorite paper & "archival"

2002-08-30 by Martin Wesley

----- Original Message -----
From: "scho_2000" <scho@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] What's your favorite paper & "archival"


> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...>
> wrote:
>
> > Since I think that image permanence is still the primary issue, I'm not
> > spending much time worrying about whether EAM is "archival."  With pure
> (or
> > predominantly) pigmented inks (like Piezo, MIS, and the 2000P pigments)
> EAM
> > is about as good as it gets.  (This is not the case for the new
> > Ultrachromes.)
>
> Paul
> Do you have any info on stability of the Ultrachrome inks?  I've heard
rumors
> that the yellow ink in particular is a problem.
> Carl
>

Carl,

John Paul Caponigro gave the following values in his review of the
Ultrachrome in the Sept./Oct. issue of Photo Techniques:

Preliminary Henry Wilhelm "longevity ratings" in 7-color mode:

Premium Glossy Photo Paper - 90+ years
Somerset Velvet for Epson - 80+ years
Premium Luster Photo Paper - 50+ years
Premium Semimatte Photo Paper - 40+ years
Enhanced Matte Paper - 30+ years

I gather the "+" signs indicate that testing is still in progress.

Martin Wesley

http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.