----- Original Message ----- From: "scho_2000" <scho@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:18 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] What's your favorite paper & "archival" > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> > wrote: > > > Since I think that image permanence is still the primary issue, I'm not > > spending much time worrying about whether EAM is "archival." With pure > (or > > predominantly) pigmented inks (like Piezo, MIS, and the 2000P pigments) > EAM > > is about as good as it gets. (This is not the case for the new > > Ultrachromes.) > > Paul > Do you have any info on stability of the Ultrachrome inks? I've heard rumors > that the yellow ink in particular is a problem. > Carl > Carl, John Paul Caponigro gave the following values in his review of the Ultrachrome in the Sept./Oct. issue of Photo Techniques: Preliminary Henry Wilhelm "longevity ratings" in 7-color mode: Premium Glossy Photo Paper - 90+ years Somerset Velvet for Epson - 80+ years Premium Luster Photo Paper - 50+ years Premium Semimatte Photo Paper - 40+ years Enhanced Matte Paper - 30+ years I gather the "+" signs indicate that testing is still in progress. Martin Wesley http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html
Message
Re: [Digital BW] What's your favorite paper & "archival"
2002-08-30 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.