I've made a direct comparison between the Canon and the Nikon 4000. The Canon ate dust.By far. Scanning BW the Nikon was a light year ahead. I bought the Nikon,even with the price difference. BTW,all my photo gear is Canon,so I was not biased... Andre Vallejo > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 03:18:45 -0000 > From: "rlsopher" <rlsopher@...> > Subject: Canoscan 4000US > > My old Nikon LS1000 has finally given up the ghost and I need to get > a new scanner for 35mm and APS film. I sold off my large and medium > format gear some time ago (age and infirmity took their toll in > carrying capacity) and won't need that capability. > > In looking around there are a plethora of scanners available but on > a cost/benefit basis the Canoscan 4000US looks pretty good. Has > anybody on the list had any experience with this beast? > > I have always had a fondness for Canon products and optics so I am > drawn not entirely rationally towards that brand. > > Other suggestions would also be welcome, of course. > > Thanks, > > Roger
Message
Re:Canoscan 4000US
2002-08-31 by André Vallejo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.