Digital BW, The Print

Ah, but I use color film and convert to black and white. That way you
can use fare, ice, etc.  Once the image is in the computer, you'd have a
very hard time telling which film it was shot on. Especially once you
make any adjustments.

Jerry

Rick Schiller wrote:
> 
> I appreciate the head's up from all on the Microtek as they do make the
> hardware for the Polaroid.   I've done some test scans with the Nikon 4000 &
> Nikon IVED.  I thought them fine scanners but almost too sharp as they
> picked up every little imperfection.  I also got some test scans with the
> Canon 4000 and they are too sharp.   With faster but fine-grained films such
> as TMY  thought the Canon was emphasizing the grain too much and made the
> scans unuseable whereas the Nikons kept grain to a minimum.
> 
> I understand there is a different light source with the Polaroid/Microtek
> that may be more suitable for BW silver-emulsion films.   I'll check this
> out further.
> 
> RIck
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/