on 8/31/2002 11:41 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote: > Message: 16 > Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:58:02 -0400 > From: "rsc236" <rsc236@...> > Subject: RE: Best 35mm BW scanner thinking > > whoh. i was at b&h last week, and the salesrep strongly recommended a > microtek 4000dpi scanner for around $1200. now i look on the website and it > shows the only microtek 4000 dpi scanner is the one for $599. was there a > mistake? a price cut? > > by the way, he said that this microtek scanner was better than the nikon > ls-4000 for non-chromogenic black and white film (cause you can't use ICE), > at any price. and much better than the canon. > > are there two microtek scanners? if not, seems to me the microtek might > just be the best value here. > > signed, confused Confused, To confuse you more, I've been using my LS-2000 for B&W silver and C-41 films and find it does a great job capturing all the info in the neg limited only by the resolution of the scanner 2700 ppi. I find the software really easy to use, once you learn the system and even at 2700 ppi, it makes sharper prints than I was ever able to achieve in the darkroom (ok, don't make fun of my darkroom skills). I like it so much that I've ordered an 8000 to replace it with, if it ever arrives. -Bruce Visit my website at: http://home.earthlink.net/~smthopr
Message
RE: Best 35mm BW scanner thinking
2002-09-01 by Bruce
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.