If your business depends on it, you really need some better kit. If you shoot 35mm mainly, why not look at digital capture instead of buying a scanner? A used Fuji S1 would give you an inexpesnive but hight quality entry route. And you would save on film and processing. Pity about the matte paper point, as Piezography would otherwise have been the obvious route for the smoothest gradations. -- Quentin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Rick Schiller" <rschiller@a...> wrote: > Much of my photo business is shooting Headshots also (see > www.rickschiller.com ) I've switched to printing digitally, scanning > from film ( TMY pulled a stop, TMX, FP4, Pan-F ) First big problem is > giving people glossy prints, no way my clients will accept matte finished > prints so that limits your ink choice. On an Epson 860 (4-color) I went > with the Lyson Quad blacks and was very disappointed with the strong > mid-tone magenta cast. I switched to Lyson Small Gamut and am getting > better tones. I use the Lyson paper. But the big problems are as follows: > > 1. Gradation is not as smooth, especially in the highlights. I have a low > end scanner ( Canon 2720 ) and really need to upgrade. I posted here 2 days > ago and don't know whether to go with a Nikon ls4000/ls40 or > Microtek/Polaroid. And if I need to spend more money on the higher end > 4000 dpi models. > 2. My digital prints are good and when duped to lithos, ordinarily look > better then many dupes I've seen from darkroom prints, sharper. But > gradation is still lacking. > 3. I have some test scans from Nikon scanners, they are sharper then the > Canon 2720. But the sharpness has a downside in that every minute mark on > the negs, which would not be picked up in the darkroom, the scanner picks up > and has to be spotted out in Photoshop. > 4. There are other issues, I'm tired of writing right now but open to all > ideas . . . . > > Yes, until I get it all resolved I'm considering going back to darkroom > printing or sending all printing work out depending on my level of bookings > in any given week. > > Rick
Message
Re: Is anyone really thrilled? Honest
2002-09-01 by qdfb
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.