--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: Sorry Martin, I didn't mean to force you into a review before you were ready. Little snippets of info here and there tend to make us drool and get unruly. > I don't see a link to a forum... right, don't know where I heard that. > but their e-mail addresses are: > > support@b... > info@b... > > I suggest that everyone take Tyler's advice and send a request to have your > favorite ink included in the plug-in. ConeTech is not going to do it from > what I am seeing. Everyone needs to understand that they couldn't make profiles for it under any circumstances. No one can or ever could, only Sundance. As far as Conetech requesting them, I suspect the issue is more complex than most of us know (actually I know it is), and why it hasn't happened, or if it has and hasn't been responded to, is more an issue for the Jerry Springer show. In the meantime your request to members may have far more impact anyway. The thing is so well priced to begin with they could even charge some small fee for additional inkset support. Most of us have only had to pay one small upgrade fee since the thing first came out. Considering what it does and the lack of any competition, it's always been a bargain. Tyler
Message
Re: [Digital BW] R9 & Imageprint was PiezoTone Selenium 300 Hr Fade test
2002-09-03 by tboleyyh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.