----- Original Message ----- From: "tboleyyh" <tyler@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 1:16 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] R9 & Imageprint was PiezoTone Selenium 300 Hr Fade test > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" > <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > > Sorry Martin, I didn't mean to force you into a review before you were > ready. Little snippets of info here and there tend to make us drool > and get unruly. Tyler, That's okay since I did make some remarks. Probably should have bit my tongue awhile longer. Basically I am still working with it and the final word is still out as far as I am concerned. I see potential in the product but I don't think that people should rush out to buy it, but, because it does have possibilities and this market is so small, I hate to see the product get blasted outright at this point in time. I think there is a lot of info on the large format versions from users on this group but very little on the 1280 version. We need more feedback. Also need to know how it compares to Sundance's BWPRO LITE which has the same price. > > > I don't see a link to a forum... > right, don't know where I heard that. > > > but their e-mail addresses are: > > > > support@b... > > info@b... > > > > I suggest that everyone take Tyler's advice and send a request to > have your > > favorite ink included in the plug-in. ConeTech is not going to do it > from > > what I am seeing. > > Everyone needs to understand that they couldn't make profiles for it > under any circumstances. No one can or ever could, only Sundance. As > far as Conetech requesting them, I suspect the issue is more complex > than most of us know (actually I know it is), and why it hasn't > happened, or if it has and hasn't been responded to, is more an issue > for the Jerry Springer show. Gee. Even I would tune it for that episode!<G> > In the meantime your request to members > may have far more impact anyway. > The thing is so well priced to begin with they could even charge some > small fee for additional inkset support. Most of us have only had to > pay one small upgrade fee since the thing first came out. Considering > what it does and the lack of any competition, it's always been a bargain. I agree on all points. I really would be happy to spend money to get multiple ink support inside the Piezo/R9 driver. If you had the original Sundance, the new Neutral Cool Sundance, MIS-FS, MIS-FS Neutral, Warm Neutral-PiezoTone, Selenium-PT and Cool Neutral-PT, all with ink specific profiles for the major papers that would be a hot product. Or sell it as is and charge for ink specific add on modules. Hiram and John I hope you are getting all this. Martin Wesley
Message
Re: [Digital BW] R9 & Imageprint was PiezoTone Selenium 300 Hr Fade test
2002-09-03 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.