> > Well, I'd argue that it's really diffuse...it's still point > light...simply > > putting a diffuser over a point light source doesn't make it a > diffuse light > > source in the traditional sense, like a cold light...does it? > > diffuse is diffuse. That said the size of the light source will > make a large > difference. If you make a very small diffuse source, it will act almost > like a point source or lens focused lamp. Well, I still say diffuse isn't necessarily diffuse. Diffuse, as far as a light source for film projection goes, MUST give a completely even field over the entire field, and I do not believe the LEDs of the Nikon scanner do such. I do know that my cold light heads do, and that the light source on my Leafscan does too. If diffuse was diffuse, with respect to this subject, then a single incandescent light bulb would be diffuse by your definition. Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.