Good God Austin, who cares what an out of focus area looks like? I only learned there actually was such a thing as bokeh about a year ago. Imagine!!! 45 years as a professional photographer and I'd never heard about it. Ever. Never read a single word about it, ever. I guarantee you that 99 percent of the people who look at pictures wouldn't know bokeh from a speed bump. I will certainly agree that if your'e obsessed with it, it would be important to you. I know, after finally reading that it existed, that a few japanese photgraphers really think its very important. But it isn't to me. Jerry > Sigh, Jerry. Sharpness isn't everything to everyone, like it is to you. > Fuji MF lenses are amongst the sharpest lenses available, but the out of > focus rendering of these lenses is miserable. It makes the images difficult > to look at, and IMO, makes the lenses unusable for anything you want decent > "bokeh" with. Who cares about bokeh? Not I. > The fact is, most Leitz and Zeiss lenses DO have better "bokeh" than most > any other manufacturers lenses. They design them that way intentionally. I bet they do! How is it that no one ever wrote about it for the last 45 years or so? How come you've never seen an ad for a camera lens bragging about it's great bokeh? Egad, enough already!
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.