Digital BW, The Print

Hallo Austin and Jerry,

Yes, everything has it's limits.
What about the limit of this:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02090601sinar22mp.asp
It's a 22 Megapixel back for MF?

But of cause it's not like a D60.  

Something for us to test and take interest instead of the D60?
I have the body and lenses - I just need this back to test if it's 
better than Technical Pan and Technodol on MF???

What do you think? I think I would get rather good prints on a 1290 
B/W with this back. But I think Techn. Pan and some Technodol cost me 
less?

Everything is a matter of taste, religion, technics and money!
Don't ever try to convert anybody - everyone has a right to has 
his/her opinion and religion. As long one is pieceful - that is!

By the way - try Minolta Multi Pro with VueScan - trash the Minolta 
software for negative film! (A new Minolta software is to be expected 
in some weeks though..)


Fiat Lux!
Bo
Sweden


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Austin Franklin" 
<darkroom@i...> wrote:
> 
> > This will be my last dissuasion with you about which is better, 
digital
> > or film. :(
> 
> Jerry,
> 
> No one is arguing with you which is better, people are simply 
discussing the
> LIMITS of both.  I know this may come as a surprise to you (that's 
sarcasm),
> but digital does have limits...  It's important to understand the 
limits of
> any medium you are using, that is if you want to make the most out 
of that
> medium...and I'm sure there are those that simply do it right 
without
> knowing squat...but that ain't me.
> 
> Austin