> Austin, Don't tell Mike Kravitt he gets useless pictures with his mamiya > because the lenses don't have Bokeh! > > What a nitpicking subject. I bet most Landscape photographers couldn't > care less about bokeh. Show me some evidence where leica and zeiss > intentionally design their lenses to have great bokeh!!! If you shoot mostly landscapes with infinity focus and small apertures, then yes, the bokeh of a lens has little bearing on your image, and yes, it'd probably be a "nitpicking subject". However, if you like to shoot people or objects and incorporate large out-of-focus portions in your images, or if you use telephoto lenses, then the bokeh of a particular lens is a very obvious and major part of the aesthetic of your images. Many photographers are concerned about every square inch of their images, whether in focus or not. I don't know about Leica and Ziess, but I can tell you Nikon and Canon's newer lenses are being designed to provide smoother rendition of out-of-focus areas. Some of Nikon's newer telephoto lenses, for instance, incorporate a larger number of diaphragm blades, creating an rounder aperture, which in turn provides a softer, smoother look to out-of-focus areas, especially highlights.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] RE: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Moreno Polloni
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.