OK Jerry, Thanks for your advice, I'll keep to Techn Pan and Technodol, until I can afford that Sinar back for my Hassy. Or any other digital camera at about 22 Meg. Until it happens, yes I will be happy with Techn Pan and my MF camera, It's good enought for me. I can also get fairly good with that outfit, I hope as good as yours? Though, the Technodol is wet. Fiat Lux! Bo --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Jerry Olson <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > Sm7, > > Yes, I'm sure that back would equal tech pan! But how much does it > cost? You could probably buy a LOT of tech pan, technidol and a drum > scanner for a lot less than that back! > > Jerry > > > > sm7bxd wrote: > > > > Hallo Austin and Jerry, > > > > Yes, everything has it's limits. > > What about the limit of this: > > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02090601sinar22mp.asp > > It's a 22 Megapixel back for MF? > > > > But of cause it's not like a D60. > > > > Something for us to test and take interest instead of the D60? > > I have the body and lenses - I just need this back to test if it's > > better than Technical Pan and Technodol on MF??? > > > > What do you think? I think I would get rather good prints on a 1290 > > B/W with this back. But I think Techn. Pan and some Technodol cost me > > less? > > > > Everything is a matter of taste, religion, technics and money! > > Don't ever try to convert anybody - everyone has a right to has > > his/her opinion and religion. As long one is pieceful - that is! > > > > By the way - try Minolta Multi Pro with VueScan - trash the Minolta > > software for negative film! (A new Minolta software is to be expected > > in some weeks though..) > > > > Fiat Lux! > > Bo > > Sweden > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Austin Franklin" > > <darkroom@i...> wrote: > > > > > > > This will be my last dissuasion with you about which is better, > > digital > > > > or film. :( > > > > > > Jerry, > > > > > > No one is arguing with you which is better, people are simply > > discussing the > > > LIMITS of both. I know this may come as a surprise to you (that's > > sarcasm), > > > but digital does have limits... It's important to understand the > > limits of > > > any medium you are using, that is if you want to make the most out > > of that > > > medium...and I'm sure there are those that simply do it right > > without > > > knowing squat...but that ain't me. > > > > > > Austin > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by sm7bxd
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.