Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Bokeh Defined

2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson

Martin, I hope someone who lists Bokeh as one of their Gods will put up
a really good example of the same image, one taken with a lens with
"bad" bokeh, and one with a lens that has simply Supergobslopsius bokeh.
 I want to see the actual difference.

In any case, I can't see a landscape photographer having any interest in
an out of focus area, as there usually aren't any.

I can just picture Ansel Adams, Just before taking his Moonrise over
Hernandez picture yelling at his assistant: I can't take this picture,
The lens on my camera doesn't have good bokeh! 

JERRY 

Martin Wesley wrote:
> 
> For those poor souls like myself going "Bokeh?" here are a couple of sites:
> 
> http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm
> http://www.pathcom.com/~vhchan/bokeh.html
> http://www.pathcom.com/~vhchan/bokeh.html
> http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/ATVB.pdf
> 
> You can find many more with a web search. Obviously a hot topic. I am more
> of the f:90 LF school so I have not really paid any attention to this. My
> initial reaction is that it seems much ado about very little, but I will
> reserve judgment as it has not been an issue in my work.
> 
> Martin Wesley
> 
> http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce" <smthopr@...>
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 10:01 AM
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: bokeh :was Shooting digital vs. film
> 
> > on 9/7/2002 1:33 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at
> > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> >
> > > Message: 13
> > > Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 23:13:21 -0700
> > > From: Robert Morrison <rmorrison@...>
> > > Subject: Re: Shooting digital vs. film
> > >
> > > On 9/6/02 8:06 PM, "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Jerry,
> > >>
> > >>> Good God Austin, who cares what an out of focus area looks like?
> > >
> > > Oh my God, Jerry, you have committed the unthinkable utterance...bokeh
> > > rules!  If you still have any leica or contax lenses you should give
> them to
> > > charity (me) to do penitence!
> > >
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > Robert
> >
> >
> > Pure speculation here:  I think that the bokeh is not a property
> "designed"
> > into these lenses, but rather a function of the distance of the lens
> > position to the film plane.  When a lens is mounted at it's optimal
> distance
> > (the focal length is it not?), the lens can be made with the minimal
> amount
> > of glass.  An SLR throws a mirror in the way of the lens mounting
> position.
> > The lenses have to be designed to project the image to the film as if the
> > lens were mounted closer than it actually is.  This makes the lenses
> larger,
> > more complex, more expensive, and poor bokeh.
> >
> > So Leitz lenses made for the leica SLR will not have the same performance
> as
> > the same focal lengths made for the rangefinder bodies. Once the focal
> > length discussed is longer than the distance from the film to the front of
> > the mirror, the design for all camera types can be the same for that lens.
> >
> > -Bruce
> >
> > Visit my website at:
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~smthopr
> >
> >
> >
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
> other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> >
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - Include your full name with your message.
> > - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> > - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
> resources on the homepage.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.