Martin, I hope someone who lists Bokeh as one of their Gods will put up a really good example of the same image, one taken with a lens with "bad" bokeh, and one with a lens that has simply Supergobslopsius bokeh. I want to see the actual difference. In any case, I can't see a landscape photographer having any interest in an out of focus area, as there usually aren't any. I can just picture Ansel Adams, Just before taking his Moonrise over Hernandez picture yelling at his assistant: I can't take this picture, The lens on my camera doesn't have good bokeh! JERRY Martin Wesley wrote: > > For those poor souls like myself going "Bokeh?" here are a couple of sites: > > http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm > http://www.pathcom.com/~vhchan/bokeh.html > http://www.pathcom.com/~vhchan/bokeh.html > http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/ATVB.pdf > > You can find many more with a web search. Obviously a hot topic. I am more > of the f:90 LF school so I have not really paid any attention to this. My > initial reaction is that it seems much ado about very little, but I will > reserve judgment as it has not been an issue in my work. > > Martin Wesley > > http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bruce" <smthopr@...> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 10:01 AM > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: bokeh :was Shooting digital vs. film > > > on 9/7/2002 1:33 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at > > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote: > > > > > Message: 13 > > > Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 23:13:21 -0700 > > > From: Robert Morrison <rmorrison@...> > > > Subject: Re: Shooting digital vs. film > > > > > > On 9/6/02 8:06 PM, "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@...> wrote: > > > > > >> Jerry, > > >> > > >>> Good God Austin, who cares what an out of focus area looks like? > > > > > > Oh my God, Jerry, you have committed the unthinkable utterance...bokeh > > > rules! If you still have any leica or contax lenses you should give > them to > > > charity (me) to do penitence! > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > Pure speculation here: I think that the bokeh is not a property > "designed" > > into these lenses, but rather a function of the distance of the lens > > position to the film plane. When a lens is mounted at it's optimal > distance > > (the focal length is it not?), the lens can be made with the minimal > amount > > of glass. An SLR throws a mirror in the way of the lens mounting > position. > > The lenses have to be designed to project the image to the film as if the > > lens were mounted closer than it actually is. This makes the lenses > larger, > > more complex, more expensive, and poor bokeh. > > > > So Leitz lenses made for the leica SLR will not have the same performance > as > > the same focal lengths made for the rangefinder bodies. Once the focal > > length discussed is longer than the distance from the film to the front of > > the mirror, the design for all camera types can be the same for that lens. > > > > -Bruce > > > > Visit my website at: > > http://home.earthlink.net/~smthopr > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Bokeh Defined
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.