Mike just got a Mamiya 7II camera and loves it! I would have one if I could afford it and about 3 lenses. Great camera ! (You had made the comment that the Mamiya lenses have horrible bokeh which make them practically useless.) Mike is on several of these lists. > > Austin, Don't tell Mike Kravitt he gets useless pictures with his mamiya > > because the lenses don't have Bokeh! > > I don't understand that comment at all. (Bokeh is) a very important subject to many photographers. > Because you never heard of it, or it's not important to you, doesn't mean it > isn't important. For some photographers, I'm sure it is important, but I've been talking about landscape photography, where there are precious few areas that are out of focus. > > Show me some evidence where leica and zeiss > > intentionally design their lenses to have great bokeh!!! > > Er, the fact that they have the best bokeh...and it's talked about in most > Leica books and Erwin Putz talks about it a lot, and it's well documented in > periodicals and magazines etc. Where could I find one of these articles that says Leitz designs their lenses to have Great bokeh? I really do want to see this in print. Also, could you post an example (Same image) shot with a lens that does have great bokeh and one that has really poor bokeh so we can see the difference you are talking about? Thanks. Jerry >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] RE: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.