Jerry, Quote you: "Hope your scanner can take advantage" End Qoute! That's the problem. I wish I had more money! The Minolta Multi Pro $3000 scanner can not take advantage of it fully out - but I assure you - it's *enought*! However for some some extra $'s I can have it drum scanned "outside"! So far I manage A2 I think, but as I have not seen your D60 result in real I'm not sure! But I believe you as well as Austin! *We* have all our different standards. *And* using those standards, (without to much theory), we can express ourself in different ways. Some call it tweaking, I think. It's good if one can't see the tweaking at all - that is an art in itself! This is like TV - go on You and Austin, I kind of like it! After this the air might be cleaner. (And indeed afterwards the US don't have to sign that Kyoto agreement...because of this....however don't blow the ozone whole further, it's now filled with "bouquet"??) <smile> Fiat Lux! Bo Sweden --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Jerry Olson <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > Bo, > > I would think Tech Pan and a Hassy neg would be good enough for ANY > body. > > Hope your scanner can take advantage of that combination! > > Except Austin, of course. :+) > > sm7bxd wrote: > > > > OK Jerry, > > > > Thanks for your advice, I'll keep to Techn Pan and Technodol, > > until I can afford that Sinar back for my Hassy. Or any other digital > > camera at about 22 Meg. > > > > Until it happens, yes I will be happy with Techn Pan and my MF camera, > > It's good enought for me. > > > > I can also get fairly good with that outfit, I hope as good as yours?
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by sm7bxd
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.