warning! Warning! do not begin a new argument with Austin. You cannot possibly hope to win. :+). Jerry Austin Franklin wrote: > > > That's how we > > know that 6-8 megapixels is all that anyone ever needs for a full-frame > > image > > Anthony, > > What's your source for that claim? What humans "need" for a "full-frame > image" is entirely different than what is needed for photographic imaging. > Also, humans have variable resolution in their sight...so how is that taken > account with your claim? > > Austin > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.